An ad hoc committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will evaluate the current standards for high-quality systematic reviews for comparative effectiveness research and ...

A systematic review finds no consistent clinical, laboratory, or treatment-related factors that predicted progression from ...

Social proof (stating what the reference group does): “Book your NHS health check. 6 million people have already attended” 16. Social comparison (giving feedback on the recipient’s behaviour compared ...

Assessments by intergovernmental bodies aim to inform decision-makers, but the conventions of systematic review often limit meaningful incorporation of non-scientific disciplines such as law. This ...

Objective To evaluate systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of exercise on general cognition, memory and executive function across all populations and ages. Methods ...

Introduction Economic evidence on community health worker (CHW) programmes is crucial for scaling these initiatives. Although decision-analytic models (DAMs) are essential for projecting long-term ...