News
Complaints about nationwide injunctions generally ... helped fund Wong Kim Ark’s landmark Supreme Court case in 1898 that enshrined birthright citizenship — houses a century-old relic in ...
The Supreme Court seems intent on keeping a block on President Donald Trump’s restrictions on birthright citizenship while looking for a way to scale back nationwide court orders.
10don MSNOpinion
The Supreme Court heard arguments this week that could reshape how federal courts block executive actions. On the surface, ...
The law professor misapplies his solution to the matter of birthright citizenship.
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is in the homestretch of a term that has lately been dominated by the Trump ...
The practice of a federal agency not following a court of appeals’ precedent beyond the specific parties to that specific ...
A federal appellate court is weighing whether to allow President Trump to end the constitutional guarantee to birthright ...
June marks the final month of the Supreme Court’s 2024-2025 term and all nine justices are racing against the clock to issue final opinions on controversial cases.
I wrote about how potential reform over the “universal” or “nationwide” injunction might affect a set of election law cases. The Supreme Court’s recent oral argument in Trump v. CASA has brought the ...
The U.S. Supreme Court, meanwhile, hasn’t ruled whether a decision from one judge can block a president’s executive order from taking effect nationwide.
The Supreme Court's 1898 ruling in United States v. Wong Kim Ark granted citizenship to the American-born child of Chinese immigrants.
John Sauer to explain the history of nationwide injunctions. The Supreme Court issued one opinion Thursday before beginning oral arguments in the birthright citizenship case. It was a unanimous ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results