court’s injunction, this Court would likely grant the government’s petition for a writ of certiorari. But they argue (Opp. 1 2-26) that the government is unlikely to succeed on the merits and that the CTA violates the Constitution on its face. Respondents’ contentions are unsound.

Today at the Court - Monday, Feb 3, 2025 The Supreme Court Building is open to the public from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. Courtroom Lectures available within the next 30 days.

ABOUT THE COURT. Justices; Supreme Court at Work; Code of Conduct for Justices; History and Traditions; The Supreme Court Building; Visiting the Court; Activities for Students & Families; Exhibitions; Building Regulations; Frequently Asked Questions

Mar 19, 2024 · gation in this Court about whether a court of appeals abused its discretion at this preliminary step—for example, by misjudging whether an administrative stay is the best way to minimize harm while the court deliberates. The real problem—and the one lurking in this case—is the risk that a court will avoid . Nken. for too long. An ad-

Court held that the United States could pursue its claims that New Mexico was “effectively breaching it s Compact duty to deliver water to the Reservoir.”

Users can search for the docket in a particular case by using a Supreme Court docket number, a case name, or other words or numbers included on a docket report. The format for Supreme Court docket numbers is "Term year-number" (e.g., 21-471; 22-5301).

Opinion of the Court NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543,

Roberson now seeks a stay of execution from this Court, but he presents no cognizable federal claim. Meanwhile, mounting evidence suggests that Nikki died from a combi-

In the Supreme Court of the United States No. XX-XX UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. STATE OF TEXAS, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI The Solicitor General, on behalf of the United States

the District Court held that the City’s destruction of Baker’s property was a compensable taking under the Fifth Amend-ment. Baker . v. McKinney, 601 F. Supp. 3d 124, 144 (E. D. Tex. 2022). Following trial, a jury awarded Baker nearly $60,000 in damages. On appeal, the Fifth Circuit reversed. The court declined